首页> 外文OA文献 >Long-term results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII: adjuvant chemotherapy plus goserelin compared with either therapy alone for premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer
【2h】

Long-term results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII: adjuvant chemotherapy plus goserelin compared with either therapy alone for premenopausal patients with node-negative breast cancer

机译:国际乳腺癌研究小组试验VIII的长期结果:绝经前结节阴性乳腺癌的辅助化疗加戈舍瑞林与单独使用两种疗法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VIII compared long-term efficacy of endocrine therapy (goserelin), chemotherapy [cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF)], and chemoendocrine therapy (CMF followed by goserelin) for pre/perimenopausal women with lymph-node-negative breast cancer. Patients and methods: From 1990 to 1999, 1063 patients were randomized to receive (i) goserelin for 24 months (n = 346), (ii) six courses of ‘classical' CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy (n = 360), or (iii) six courses of CMF plus 18 months goserelin (CMF→ goserelin; n = 357). Tumors were classified as estrogen receptor (ER) negative (19%), ER positive (80%), or ER unknown (1%); 19% of patients were younger than 40. Median follow-up was 12.1 years. Results: For the ER-positive cohort, sequential therapy provided a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) (12-year DFS = 77%) compared with CMF alone (69%) and goserelin alone (68%) (P = 0.04 for each comparison), due largely to the effect in younger patients. Patients with ER-negative tumors whose treatment included CMF had similar DFS (12-year DFS CMF = 67%; 12-year DFS CMF→ goserelin = 69%) compared with goserelin alone (12-year DFS = 61%, P= NS). Conclusions: For pre/perimenopausal women with lymph-node-negative ER-positive breast cancer, CMF followed by goserelin improved DFS in comparison with either modality alone. The improvement was the most pronounced in those aged below 40, suggesting an endocrine effect of prolonged CMF-induced amenorrhea
机译:背景:国际乳腺癌研究小组第八次试验比较了内分泌疗法(戈塞瑞林),化学疗法[环磷酰胺,甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶(CMF)]和化学内分泌疗法(CMF,然后是戈舍瑞林)对绝经前/围绝经期妇女的长期疗效淋巴结阴性乳腺癌。患者和方法:从1990年至1999年,随机将1063名患者接受(i)戈舍瑞林治疗24个月(n = 346),(ii)六疗程的“经典” CMF(环磷酰胺,甲氨蝶呤,5-氟尿嘧啶)化疗(n = 360),或(iii)6个疗程的CMF加18个月的戈舍瑞林(CMF→戈舍瑞林; n = 357)。肿瘤分为雌激素受体(ER)阴性(19%),ER阳性(80%)或ER不明(1%); 19%的患者年龄小于40岁。中位随访时间为12.1年。结果:对于ER阳性队列,相较于单独使用CMF(69%)和单独使用戈舍瑞林(68%),序贯治疗对无病生存期(DFS)(12年DFS = 77%)具有统计学上的显着益处(P每次比较= 0.04),这在很大程度上是由于年轻患者的影响。与单独使用戈舍瑞林的患者(12年DFS = 61%,P = NS)相比,接受CMF治疗的ER阴性肿瘤患者的DFS相似(12年DFS CMF = 67%; 12年DFS CMF→戈舍瑞林= 69%)。 )。结论:对于绝经前/围绝经期妇女的淋巴结阴性ER阳性乳腺癌,与单独使用任何一种方式相比,CMF联合戈斯瑞林可改善DFS。这种改善在40岁以下的人群中最为明显,表明长期CMF引起的闭经具有内分泌作用

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号